测试题: 做一次SCI期刊主编,分析审稿意见


   Papergoing论文服务团队在从事“论文预审”和“内容提升”等服务项目中发现,大量论文存在着质量不达标的问题,而这些问题经常会被审稿人发现和批评,为了让大家更好的避免这些问题,Papergoing大数据中心正在进行真实审稿意见的大数据分析,将不断提供真实审稿意见的测试题,让大家做一回SCI期刊主编,当你收到这些审稿意见,你会怎么评价论文质量呢?欢迎参与。

题目1【某题目的审稿意见】“The title and objective do not agree well. What the manuscript actually presents is not well described in the introduction and in the title. The authors do not express clearly and consistently the aims, objectives and rationale of the study” 请选出最匹配的选项:

   A:太泛,无核心信息
   B:不能准确互相反映
   C:缩写/简写
   D:太普通

题目2【某摘要的审稿意见】“The abstract should be re-written in short form to highlight briefly the state of the problem, research motivation, work objectives and scope ” 请选出最匹配的选项:

   A:太长,< 150-250
   B:要素不完整
   C:要素不准确

题目3【某引言的审稿意见】“The literature review in the introduction is weak - I would expect better treatment of the literature related specifically to state estimation in a marine environment” 请选出最匹配的选项:

   A:太短或长
   B:要素不完整
   C:深度不够
   D:脱离后文
   E:逻辑不清晰
   F:语言质量低
   G:参考文献旧或不全

题目4【某方法的审稿意见】“By using a double shear test specimen in conjunction with preloaded bolts, radial displacements of the tubes arising from Barlow’s formula are totally neglected. The radial stiffness of the connection is wrongly considered and mostly overestimated if bolts are used.” 请选出最匹配的选项:

   A:方法不严谨
   B:方法描述不充分
   C:样本不具代表性
   D:数据分析不合理
   E:没有控制样本/条件
   F:原型不具代表性

题目5【某结果的审稿意见】“This structure strengthen the impression that this section is a bulleted list of results rather than a reasoned presentation of your findings. I would suggest to address this issue.” 请选出最匹配的选项:

   A:冗余,无创新
   B:图表太多
   C:图形质量太差
   D:罗列结果,逻辑性差
   E:结果内容缺失、反常

题目6【某讨论的审稿意见】“In general, during the discussion of test results, the authors are suggested to state more clearly whether the rebars are transverse reinforcement or longitudinal reinforcement. Two types of reinforcement may contribute to the column in different ways.” 请选出最匹配的选项:

   A:结构不合理,与结果不密切
   B:讨论不完整
   C:讨论不深入,不具体
   D:缺乏文献引用

题目7【某结论的审稿意见】“Are authors sure that the considered building can give general information on the studied phenomena? The conclusions may be valid only for this case.” 请选出最匹配的选项:

   A:不准确或低价值
   B:说服力弱,无数据支撑
   C:逻辑不够,阅读不顺畅
   D:描述概括过多,下结论过少
   E:无价值分析或局限性分析
   F:适用范围过大

题目8【某参考文献的审稿意见】“I go through the paper, and found that there are 14 refs. and 10 of them are from China. We may think the paper to be regional and may not attract international researchers.” 请选出最匹配的选项:

   A:文献太旧
   B:文献不够国际化分布
   C:有无法获取或下载的文献
   D:用中文撰写的文献
   E:格式不符合期刊要求
   F:文献数量太少或太多


<script></script>